One interesting phenomenon over the past decade has been the rise of so-called "bromances," intimate, but non-sexual, relationships between straight men. Affectionate male bonding has a centuries-long tradition around the world, yet American society has generally drawn rigid lines between two heterosexual males who are friends. Bromances are said to break down many of those barriers, allowing a man to be more expressive of both his own feelings and his feelings toward his male friend. Just why American male friendships are seemingly more open these days is up to debate. Some argue these bonds have been shaped by everything from feminist mothers raising more emotionally open sons to the gay rights movement to younger generations of men simply disregarding old societal taboos. But are younger men today really more open to intimate male friendships? Is this truly a new phenomenon or have men always been free to express themselves emotionally with other men? Finally, if you are a man, what has been your experience been with bromances?
Include at least three of the following in your discussion:
- "Are You in a Bromance? (Or is it Just a Man Crush?)" DETAILS
- "The Ten Biggest Bromances in Sports" BLEACHER REPORT
- "Bromances Aren't Uncommon as Guys Delay Marriage" SEATTLE TIMES
- "Study: A Guy’s Bromances May Help Keep Sex With His Wife Alive" TIME
- "I Love You, Man (as a Friend)" NEW YORK TIMES
- "The Collective Mind: Affectionate Men" SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE
Requirements:
- Must be in MLA Style
- Must be two full pages in length
- Must include a works cited page
Due: Thursday, Sept. 6th
No comments:
Post a Comment